Peer Review Process
JUDIKA applies a rigorous peer review process to ensure the quality and integrity of published articles.
Review Stages
- Initial Screening
- All submitted manuscripts are screened by the editorial team to ensure compliance with the journal’s scope and author guidelines.
- Manuscripts that do not meet the criteria will be rejected at this stage.
- Plagiarism Check
- Manuscripts are checked using plagiarism detection software.
- Articles with high similarity will be returned to authors for revision or rejected.
- Double-Blind Peer Review
- Manuscripts that pass the initial screening are sent to two reviewers with expertise in the relevant field.
- The review process is double-blind, meaning both authors and reviewers remain anonymous to ensure objectivity.
- Reviewer Evaluation
Reviewers assess manuscripts based on: - Originality and contribution to the field of education.
- Research methodology quality.
- Clarity of results and discussion.
- Relevance to the journal’s scope.
- Editorial Decision
Based on reviewers’ recommendations, the editor will decide whether the manuscript is: - Accepted without revision.
- Accepted with minor revision.
- Accepted with major revision.
- Rejected.
- Author Revision
- Authors are required to revise manuscripts according to reviewers’ and editors’ comments.
- Revised manuscripts will be re-evaluated before acceptance.
- Final Decision & Publication
- The editor is responsible for the final acceptance decision.
- Accepted articles proceed to production and are published as open access.
